Harm Reduction: Reducing Harm or Enabling Addicts?
By Jeremy Reynalds, Senior Correspondent, ASSIST News Service (jeremyreynalds@gmail.com )
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (ANS - Feb. 29, 2016) -- It’s easy (for some) to condemn “harm reduction.”
So you don’t know what that is? It’s the giving of clean needles to drug addicts, and condoms to sex workers and others.
Like
many evangelicals, I used to criticize harm reduction workers as
promoting irresponsible sex and illegal drug use. The problem was, I had
never bothered to talk with them.
Once
I did, I found they're not promoting random sex or drug use. They're
attempting to keep hurting people alive until they're ready to seek the
recovery they need to stay alive. Shouldn't evangelicals be applauding
that? You can't preach the Gospel to a dead person.
There was a minor furor among some Christians a few years ago when a Christian nurse working in Canada offered a defense of harm reduction.
I
lost a handful of Facebook friends at the time over an article I wrote
in its defense, but hadn’t thought about it much since then until I saw a
recent piece about Ithaca’s mayor who wants to let heroin users shoot up under medical supervision
The Washington Times reported that
Mayor Svante Myrick, 28, says he’ll ask New York’s Health Department to
declare Ithaca’s heroin problem a state health crisis so he can pursue
efforts to establish a center where addicts can shoot drugs under the
care of a nurse without risking arrest and while diminishing the odds of
death.
This is his official plan.
The executive summary reads in part, “Too often, our past approaches
have failed to recognize that fundamentally, the community prevalence of
health problems, such as problem drug use, and social problems, such as
participation in the illegal drug economy, reflect deeper issues
related to social and economic opportunity and racial inequality.”
While
harm reduction is only one part of this mayor’s four pronged plan
against drug use, I wondered what some of our Joy Junction guests
thought about hard reduction, so I had some of our staff do a quick
unscientific survey.
Out of 19 people who responded, 11 were for the practice, seven were against and one was undecided.
One
woman said she thinks harm reduction is a good thing, as it reduces the
risks of spreading diseases and infections. “I don’t think it is
contributing to drug or sex use.”
Another woman agreed, saying that harm reduction also stops unwanted pregnancies.
Someone
else said that it’s far from the promotion of sex and drugs. “It is
protecting the rest of the world from disease. ‘Kill them with
Kindness.’”
Another individual said she also thinks it’s a good idea.
She
added, “I shared needles with others and got Hep-C. Had I had clean
needles it would have never happened. Giving condoms to sex workers will
help stop the spread of diseases and unwanted pregnancies.”
Perhaps most surprising were the forceful statements of those shelter guests who disapprove of hard reduction.
One
guy said, “I think that providing what is being called a harm reduction
program is just promoting the sinful practices of the participants.”
A woman said that giving needles and condoms to addicts and prostitutes “gives the okay to do it.”
Another
individual said that while she sees the “positive side” of harm
reduction, it is still enabling them to keep up their “bad behavior.
She added, “Taking away consequences then there will be more users thinking it is OK ... Education is the only true cure.”
Perhaps
a more thoughtful response came from a woman who said that she’s okay
with harm reduction “as long as there is a follow up or presentation
with/ for the recipient to straighten up their lives and provide
alternatives for the moment that presents itself.”
Of course, Facebook is always a good source for opinion, so I asked some of our Joy Junction Facebook fans what they thought.
We got plenty of comments.
Mike said the practice definitely won’t create new heroin users.
He
added, “And it will ensure that existing users don't have to resort to
dirty needles that lead to BAD things for their peers, families and
sexual partners. And lastly, there is no doubt that when they go into
the facility to shoot up, they are in the ONE place equipped with the
tools to help them actually make the decision to QUIT.”
There
was a very thoughtful response from Angelina, who wrote that sometimes
there is just no ending the addiction, and if the person isn’t ready for
change, there is no way it can be forced.
She
continued, “They can continue to use on the streets, sharing dirty
needles and improperly entering their blood pathways, furthering
endangering themselves and causing greater risk of transferring
communicable disease or they can use a clean and sterile needle, under
medical supervision, and ensure that it will be disposed of and not
shared. They're going to use regardless; this would help reduce the risk
of harm to them and others. And, yes, this could potentially lead to a
reduction in drug use, and maybe even elimination of it in some
individuals.”
And while some anti-drug vaccines could be on the horizon, as one researcher said,
“Interestingly, while an anti-cocaine or anti-heroin vaccine eliminates
the drugs effects (both pleasant and unpleasant), that doesn't by
itself curb a user's desire. The person still has to want to get clean
... ”
In
the meantime, hard reduction might just be the best we have. Isn’t it
just as unconscionable not to help a sick, addicted hurting person stay
alive as it is to ignore the plight of a hungry person?
Speaking
specifically to evangelicals. Whether you choose to define a sex worker
or someone who injects heroin as an addict, a sinful person or as both,
shouldn't we who say we have been forgiven so much by a loving God want
to share that same love with those in need?
And if you don’t believe in harm reduction, what is the viable alternative?
For more information visit here.
Photo captions: 1) A drug addict injecting himself. 2) Jeremy and Elma Reynalds.
About the writer: Jeremy Reynalds is Senior Correspondent for the ASSIST News Service, a freelance writer and also the founder and CEO of Joy Junction, New Mexico's largest emergency homeless shelter, www.joyjunction.org. He has a master's degree in communication from the University of New Mexico, and a Ph.D. in intercultural education from Biola University in Los Angeles. His newest book is "From Destitute to Ph.D." Additional details on "From Destitute to Ph.D." are available at www.myhomelessjourney.com. Reynalds lives in Albuquerque, New Mexico with his wife, Elma. For more information contact: jeremyreynalds@gmail.com.
Note: If you would like to help support the ASSIST News Service, please go to www.assistnews.net and click on the DONATE button to make your tax-deductible gift (in the US), which will help us continue to bring you these important stories. If you prefer a check, please make it out to ASSIST and mail it to: PO Box 609, Lake Forest, CA 92609, USA. Thank you.
About the writer: Jeremy Reynalds is Senior Correspondent for the ASSIST News Service, a freelance writer and also the founder and CEO of Joy Junction, New Mexico's largest emergency homeless shelter, www.joyjunction.org. He has a master's degree in communication from the University of New Mexico, and a Ph.D. in intercultural education from Biola University in Los Angeles. His newest book is "From Destitute to Ph.D." Additional details on "From Destitute to Ph.D." are available at www.myhomelessjourney.com. Reynalds lives in Albuquerque, New Mexico with his wife, Elma. For more information contact: jeremyreynalds@gmail.com.
Note: If you would like to help support the ASSIST News Service, please go to www.assistnews.net and click on the DONATE button to make your tax-deductible gift (in the US), which will help us continue to bring you these important stories. If you prefer a check, please make it out to ASSIST and mail it to: PO Box 609, Lake Forest, CA 92609, USA. Thank you.
** You may republish this and any of our ANS stories with attribution to the ASSIST News Service (www.assistnews.net)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar